Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geneva Conventions in Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker^talk 02:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Geneva Conventions in Pictures

Geneva Conventions in Pictures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to me to be an advertisement, but looking for a second opinion. The article itself makes no claim of notability that would satisfy WP:GNG. // Posted by larsona (Talk) // 01:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 09:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 09:48, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:28, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

• Comment: Getting nominated for a TedxAmsterdam Award isn't very difficult to do, since it seems like all you need to do is submit an application. However it was a finalist (even made it into the top three, which helps matters some but I'm unable to locate who won, which is what ultimately matters with awards. However, there's also the issue of whether or not an award given by an independent portion of TED is notable enough to give partial notability, but we'll cross that bridge if I can find anything to show that it won. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

• It didn't win. The Alzheimer's one did. On a side note, the award does seem to garner quite a bit of press so the award itself would show notability for the winner, however per guidelines it will only give notability for the winner and not the nominees. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. While the idea behind this is a good one and I solidly wish it'd received more coverage, unfortunately it never received anything beyond the TedxAmsterdam nod, which cannot show notability since it's just a nomination. It received a brief mention in Baaz, but only an offhand mention in regards to the award ceremony, which isn't enough. As far as I can tell, this project is still under development, so hopefully in the future it'll receive more coverage, but right now it's just far WP:TOOSOON for it to have an entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
• Delete because no sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.